You might remember my original GluserFS/OpenVZ benchmark which produced a horrible 29.8

This is the exact same system, but using the latest 2.0.8 (with some small files patch which speeds up performance) you can see it is about 25% faster.

I also haven't tuned my config files at all, but there are some settings that should increase performance on small files which I believe is the main cause of slow performance when running GlusterFS under OpenVZ

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

                 4        1           Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
                44       11
   v   v       4 4        1
    v v       44444       1           v4.1 revisions mostly by David C. Niemi,
     v           4   o   111 - WHT.2  Reston, VA, USA  <niemi@tux.org>

WHT Variant by Andy A. Lee <andylee@dslextreme.com>
See: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=308055


Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2

Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2

Execl Throughput  1

Filesystem Throughput 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1

Filesystem Throughput 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1

Filesystem Throughput 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1

Pipe Throughput  1 2

Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2

Process Creation  1

System Call Overhead  1 2

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1

==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System -- Linux 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.028stab064.7PAE #1 SMP Fri Aug 21 03:42:35 MSD 2009 i686                                                   i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/simfs            62914560   1871360  61043200   3% /

Start Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 28 16:49:57 PST 2009
 16:49:57 up 18:00,  1 user,  load average: 0.16, 0.03, 0.01

End Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 28 17:00:28 PST 2009
 17:00:28 up 18:11,  1 user,  load average: 16.02, 5.51, 2.09


                     INDEX VALUES
TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7 19600869.3      520.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      984.9      118.5
Execl Throughput                               188.3       75.1        4.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     7127.0       26.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     1854.0       17.2
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0    54315.0       35.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   500165.4      323.8
Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  1570669.8      140.5
Process Creation                               569.3      186.1        3.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8       15.9        3.5
System Call Overhead                        114433.5  2170342.9      189.7
                                                                 =========
     FINAL SCORE                                                      39.8
 

unixbench, glusterfs, openvz, quad, xeon, updated, gluserfs, benchmark, produced, speeds, haven, tuned, config, settings, byte, unix, revisions, niemi, wht, reston, va, usa, tux, org, variant, andylee, dslextreme, http, www, webhostingtalk, showthread, php, threadid, dhrystone, register, variables, precision, whetstone, execl, throughput, filesystem, bufsize, maxblocks, context, switching, creation, overhead, shell, scripts, concurrent, benchmarks, linux, pae, smp, fri, aug, msd, gnu, dev, simfs, nov, pst, user, index, baseline,

Latest Articles