Unixbench Score on Core i5 750 with OpenVZ Kernel vs Xen/Openvz

This was unbelievable how much the Xen kernel slows things down, keep in mind both tests were done on the hostnode, one was with the Openvz-Xen hybrid kernel and the other was just OpenVZ. You can see the performance difference is nearly 300% better when not using the Xen kernel.

OpenVZ-Xen Kernel Test Results (I was wondering what was wrong/so slow with my Core i5!)


# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

4 1 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
44 11
v v 4 4 1
v v 44444 1 v4.1 revisions mostly by David C. Niemi,
v 4 o 111 - WHT.2 Reston, VA, USA

WHT Variant by Andy A. Lee
See: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=308055


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2

Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2

Execl Throughput 1

Filesystem Throughput 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1

Filesystem Throughput 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1

Filesystem Throughput 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1

Pipe Throughput 1 2

Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2

Process Creation 1

System Call Overhead 1 2

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1

==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System -- Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.5xen #1 SMP Tue May 18 18:33:35 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/sda3 19236340 177016 18082172 1% /mnt/sda3

Start Benchmark Run: Sat May 29 01:28:00 EDT 2010
01:28:00 up 2:38, 2 users, load average: 0.32, 0.10, 0.02

End Benchmark Run: Sat May 29 01:38:35 EDT 2010
01:38:35 up 2:48, 2 users, load average: 12.47, 5.83, 2.66


INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 24942262.7 662.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1518.5 182.7
Execl Throughput 188.3 4822.1 256.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 69636.0 260.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 25286.0 234.8
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 829674.0 539.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 149570.1 96.8
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 416802.5 37.3
Process Creation 569.3 7657.1 134.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1084.6 242.1
System Call Overhead 114433.5 3620305.9 316.4
=========
FINAL SCORE 211.6

OpenVZ only Kernel,now the Core i5 shows its performance!


# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

4 1 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
44 11
v v 4 4 1
v v 44444 1 v4.1 revisions mostly by David C. Niemi,
v 4 o 111 - WHT.2 Reston, VA, USA

WHT Variant by Andy A. Lee
See: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=308055


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2

Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2

Execl Throughput 1

Filesystem Throughput 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1

Filesystem Throughput 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1

Filesystem Throughput 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1

Pipe Throughput 1 2

Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2

Process Creation 1

System Call Overhead 1 2

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1

==============================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System -- Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.5PAE #1 SMP Tue May 18 18:26:13 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/md0 297581760 1276412 280945208 1% /

Start Benchmark Run: Sat May 29 01:55:39 EDT 2010
01:55:39 up 2 min, 1 user, load average: 0.57, 0.30, 0.11

End Benchmark Run: Sat May 29 02:06:06 EDT 2010
02:06:06 up 13 min, 2 users, load average: 15.13, 6.61, 2.95


INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 24876280.4 660.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1515.2 182.3
Execl Throughput 188.3 17397.6 923.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 379937.0 1421.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 107354.0 996.8
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 2918897.0 1897.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 973442.9 630.1
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 3216279.5 287.6
Process Creation 569.3 50262.7 882.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 3636.8 811.8
System Call Overhead 114433.5 3680141.7 321.6
=========
FINAL SCORE 671.4

The difference is easy to see

Xen Kernel=211.6

OpenVZ Kernel=671.4

OpenVZ is more than 3x faster. I would hate to see the poor results inside a Xen container. How can Xen claim such high performance when this is clearly not the case?


/proc/cpuinfo

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2666.780
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm [8]
bogomips : 5333.56

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2666.780
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm [8]
bogomips : 5333.21

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2666.780
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 2
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 4
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm [8]
bogomips : 5333.24

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 30
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 2666.780
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 6
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm [8]
bogomips : 5333.24

This system has a GA-H57M-USB3 motherboard, 4Gigs of DDR3 and a RAID1 Western Digital 2TB 64Meg cache disk array, running Centos 5.5 32 bit.


Tags:

unixbench, openvz, kernel, vs, xen, openvzthis, slows, hostnode, hybrid, byte, unix, benchmark, revisions, niemi, wht, reston, va, usa, tux, org, variant, andylee, dslextreme, http, www, webhostingtalk, showthread, php, threadid, dhrystone, register, variables, precision, whetstone, execl, throughput, filesystem, bufsize, maxblocks, context, switching, creation, overhead, shell, scripts, concurrent, benchmarks, linux, localhost, localdomain, smp, tue, msd, gnu, dev, sda, mnt, edt, users, index, baseline, pae, md, min, user, container, proc, cpuinfo, processor, vendor_id, genuineintel, cpu, intel, tm, ghz, stepping, mhz, cache, kb, siblings, cores, apicid, fdiv_bug, hlt_bug, f_bug, coma_bug, fpu, fpu_exception, cpuid, wp, flags, vme, pse, tsc, msr, mce, cx, apic, sep, mtrr, pge, mca, cmov, clflush, dts, acpi, mmx, fxsr, sse, ss, ht, pbe, nx, rdtscp, lm, constant_tsc, ida, nonstop_tsc, pni, ds_cpl, vmx, smx, est, ssse, xtpr, _, popcnt, lahf_lm, bogomips, ga, usb, motherboard, gigs, ddr, raid, western, digital, tb, meg, disk, array, centos,

Latest Articles

  • Microsoft Teams Linux - Calendar Doesn't Work Missed Meetings!
  • Scanner not working in Linux Ubuntu Fedora Mint Debian over the network? Use sane-airscan!
  • How To Boot, Install and Run Windows 2000 on QEMU-KVM
  • bash cannot execute permission denied
  • Huion and Wacom Tablets How To Install in Linux Mint / Ubuntu and make the stylus work properly
  • ffmpeg how to cut certain parts of video out
  • ffmpeg how to concat and join two video clips
  • mencoder instead of ffmpeg to join or concatenate video files with different audio streams
  • Linux How To Stop Missing Drive from Halting Boot Process in fstab
  • How To Replace Audio Track of Video using ffmpeg
  • qemu-img convert formats vdi vmdk raw qcow2
  • Linux and Windows Dual Boot Crazy Time Issues
  • dynagen / dynamips 100% high CPU usage solution - how to set the idlepc value
  • How To Setup a Cisco CME (Cisco Manager Express) Virtual Router under Linux using dynamips and dynagen
  • Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian CentOS Dual Boot Install Issues
  • Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Centos RHEL no sound solution
  • Linux Mint/Debian/Ubuntu/Centos Installer black grub screen and blank screen after trying to boot installer or main OS
  • Linux Mint Dual Boot Install Avoid Wiping our your Main C: drive /dev/sda MBR and EFI
  • QEMU-KVM soundhw deprecated how to enable sound in QEMU 4.x series
  • Virtualbox Error Cannot register the hard disk because a hard disk with UUID already exists solution